Listed on 27.09.2023 for argument. Learned counsel for respondent No. 1 initially sought time to argue but subsequently opposed the same.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Appeal Dy. No. 159/2022 Date: 14.07.2023
Kotak Mahindra Bank Limited Vs. Uttar Pradesh State Cement Corporation Ltd.
Present: Shri O. P. Mishra along with Shri Sandeep Arora, counsel for the appellant-Bank, Shri D. N. Awasthi, counsel for the respondent No. 1, None for the respondent-O.L. Ex-parte against the respondents Nos. 3 to 6, Shri Maneesh Mehrotra, counsel for the respondent no. 7,
Learned counsel for the respondent no. 1 seeks time to argue the matter, to which the learned counsel for the respondent no. 1 has opposed the same.
List this case on 27.09.2023. Till then the interim order, if any, shall continue.
Justice R. D. Khare Chairperson
Anupam
Kotak Mahindra Bank Limited
Uttar Pradesh State Cement Corporation Ltd.
R. D. Khare
As recorded by the court registry
23 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
