Kotak Mahindra Bank Limited v. Uttar Pradesh State Cement Corporation Ltd. and Ors.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Appeal Dy. No. 159/2022 Date: 22.07.2022
Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd. Vs. Uttar Pradesh State Cement Corporation Ltd. & Ors.
Present: Shri O. P. Mishra, counsel for the appellant-Bank, None for the respondent no. 1 Shri D. N. Awasthi, counsel for the respondent no. 2, Shri Kush Saxena, counsel for the intervener-State Bank of India,
The order-sheets show that till date no notice has been issued to the remaining respondents, therefore, the appellant is directed to take steps for service of notice upon them by two modes i.e. Registered Post with A.D. and Speed Post. Affidavit of service along with tracking report be filed by the next date.
Learned counsel for the appellant seeks time to file rejoinder to the reply filed by the respondent no. 2.
List this case on 29.09.2022 for service. Till then the interim order, if any, shall remain operative.
Justice R. D. Khare Chairperson
Anupam
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the appellant requires time to file rejoinder before restoration
Whether remaining respondents required to be served with notice
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd.
- respondent
Uttar Pradesh State Cement Corporation Ltd.
Coram
R. D. Khare
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- DRAT
- Decided on
- · July
- CNR
- 091090001592022
- Topic
- Banking and Recovery
All orders in this case
23 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court