Kotak Mahindra Bank Limited v. Uttar Pradesh State Cement Corporation Ltd. and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court listed the appeal for further hearing on an application by the appellant regarding recovery procedures and an interim order, without disposing of the matter.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Appeal Dy. No. 159/2022 Date: 27.03.2023
Kotak Mahindra Bank Limited Vs. Uttar Pradesh State Cement Corporation Ltd.
Present: Shri Anurag Khanna, Sr. Advocate assisted by Shri O. P. Mishra, counsel for the appellant-Bank, Shri D. N. Awasthi, counsel for the respondent No. 1, Shri Vivek Yadav, Advocate holding brief of Shri Arnab Banerji, counsel for the respondent-O.L. Ex-parte against the respondents Nos. 3 to 6, None for the respondent no. 7,
Learned counsel for the appellant contends that as there is misreading of the judgment and order by the Tribunal below, the respondent may approach before the recovery officer under Rule 11 of the second schedule of the Income Tax Act, if they have no objection to the execution of recovery certificate.
As jointly prayed, list this case for further hearing on 25.04.2023. Till then the interim order, if any, shall continue.
Justice R. D. Khare Chairperson
Anupam
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Kotak Mahindra Bank Limited
- respondent
Uttar Pradesh State Cement Corporation Ltd.
Coram
R. D. Khare
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- DRAT
- Decided on
- · March
- CNR
- 091090001592022
- Topic
- Income Tax
All orders in this case
23 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court