M/S Niku Tent House v. Nitin Khare and Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
GAHC010027742022 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT…
GAHC010027742022 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010027742022
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : Cont.Cas(C)/82/2022
M/S NIKU TENT HOUSE
REPRESENTED BY ITS PROPRIETOR SRI PRANAB JYOTI BAYAN, S/O- LATE JOGENDRA NATH BAYAN, R/O- MOUKHARI, P.O. KEOTKUCHI, P.S. AND DIST. BARPETA, ASSAM
VERSUS
NITIN KHARE AND ANR
CHIEF ELECTORAL OFFICER, ASSAM,DISPUR, GUWAHATI-781006.
2:TEJ PRASAD BHUSAL DEPUTY COMMISSIONER CUM DISTRICT BARPETA BARPETA ELECTION OFFICER BARPETA
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. J SARMAH
Advocate for the Respondent : MR. A I Ali
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUMAN SHYAM
ORDER
Date : 08/08/2022
Heard Mr. J. Sarmah, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. A. Ali, learned counsel appearing for the respondent no.1, who has produced a copy of the notification dated 07/03/2022 to submit that the amount has already been released and, therefore, the order dated 04/09/2021 passed
Page No.# 2/2
by this Court, has been complied with. The said assertion has not been disputed by Mr. Sarmah,
learned counsel for the petitioner.
In view of the above, this contempt case stands closed.
A copy of the notification dated 07/03/2022 be retained in the case record.
JUDGE
sukhamay
Comparing Assistant
M/S NIKU TENT HOUSE (represented by Sri Pranab Jyoti Bayan)
Nitin Khare and ANR
Suman Shyam
As recorded by the court registry
Proceedings for wilful disobedience of a court order under the Contempt of Courts Act 1971.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court