Writ petitioner absent for three consecutive hearings. Government advocate submitted pending bill cleared; court found nothing for decision.
Writ petition disposed of as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010011012016
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : WP(C)/1637/2016
DIPEN SARMA
S/O- LT. BHUPENDRA NATH SARMA, R/O- GOPINATH NAGAR, KALAPAHAR, GUWAHATI, DIST.- KAMRUP M.
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 2 ORS REP. BY THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, ASSAM, GUWAHATI.
2:SENIOR SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE CITY GUWAHATI.
3:MOTOR TRANSPORT OFFICER CITY POLICE GUWAHATI
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR.K N SHARMA
Advocate for the Respondent : GA, ASSAM
BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUMAN SHYAM
ORDER
Date : 06/08/2022
None appears for the writ petitioner. Petitioner’s counsel was absent on three consecutive
occasions when the matter was called up before this Court.
Page No.# 2/2
Ms. M. Barman, learned Government Advocate, Assam, submits on instruction that the
pending bill of the petitioner has already been cleared by the department and, therefore, nothing survives for decision in this writ petition. In support of her above argument, Ms. Barman has produced a copy of the communication dated 23/06/2022 issued by the Deputy Commissioner of Police (Crime), Guwahati.
I have perused the same.
In view of the above, this writ petition stands disposed of as infructuous.
A copy of the communication dated 23/06/2022 be retained in the record.
JUDGE
sukhamay
Comparing Assistant
Dipen Sarma
The State of Assam
Suman Shyam
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
