Jitendra Kumar Agarwal v. Ranjana Barua and Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
The Gauhati High Court closed a contempt case on the submission that the earlier order had been complied with and the amount was received by the petitioner.
What did the court decide?
Contempt case closed due to compliance with the earlier order.
What the court decided
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010152672019
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : Cont.Cas(C)/450/2019
JITENDRA KUMAR AGARWAL
S/O- SRI OM PRAKASH AGARWAL, SOLE PROPRIETOR OF M/S SRI M.V.D UDYOG, SHREE KUNJ, HOUSE NO. 22B, JIBAN KRISHNA PATH, HENGRABARI, NEAR L.P.SCHOOL,, GHY- 36, DIST- KAMRUP (M), ASSAM
VERSUS
RANJANA BARUA AND ANR. COMM. AND SECY. TO THE DEPTT. OF TEA TRIBES WELFARE, GOVT. OF ASSAM,, DISPUR, P.O. GHY-6, ASSAM
2:PALASH RANJAN GAHRPHALIA DIRECTOR FOR WELFARE OF TEA AND EX. TEA GARDEN TRIBES ASSAM RUPNAGAR GHY- 32 DIST- KAMRUP (M) ASSAM
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. O P BHATI
Advocate for the Respondent : MS. M BHATTACHARJEE
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Jitendra Kumar Agarwal
- respondent
Ranjana Barua
Coram
Suman Shyam
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Gauhati HC
- Decided on
- · August
- Registered
- Case no.
- Cont.Cas(C)/450/2019
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court