Petitioner in a contempt case submitted that a prior order of the Court has been complied with. The Court accepted this submission and closed the contempt proceedings.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010105712021
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : Cont.Cas(C)/392/2021
SMTI DIPALI DAIMARI
W/O LATE REMN DAIMARI, R/O VILL- MAHINA BUNBARI, P.S.GHOGRAPAR, DIST- NALBARI, ASSAM
VERSUS
M S MANIVANNAN AND ANR THE SECRETARY AND COMMISSIONER TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM, REVENUE AND DISASTER MANAGEMENT (RELIEF AND REHABILITATION) DEPARTMENT, DISPUR, GUWAHATI-6
2:AAYUSH GARG IAS THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER BAKSA P.O. AND P.S.-MUSULPUR DIST- BAKSA BTAD PIN-78136
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR I HAQUE
Advocate for the Respondent : MR. D SAIKIA (R-1,2)
BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUMAN SHYAM
ORDER
Date : 08-08-2022
Page No.# 2/2
Mr. I. Haque, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the order of this Court
has already been complied with and therefore, this contempt case has become infructuous.
Taking note of the submission of Mr. Haque, this contempt case stands closed.
Mr. R. Borpujari, learned standing counsel, Finance Department is present on behalf of the respondent Nos. 1 and 2.
JUDGE
GS
Comparing Assistant
Smti Dipali Daimari
M S Manivannan
Aayush Garg
Suman Shyam
As recorded by the court registry
Proceedings for wilful disobedience of a court order under the Contempt of Courts Act 1971.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
