The Gauhati High Court dismissed a contempt application filed by the petitioner, noting that the submitted condition under the order against which application was filed had been complied with and therefore dismissed the application.
Petition for contempt of court closed and dismissed as impugned order was complied with.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010122692021
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : Cont.Cas(C)/290/2021
NUR JAHAN BEGOM AHMED
W/O LT. ABUL HUSSAIN MIAH, VILL-DUDHNATH HILL (SONAMUKHI), P.O.-TILAPARA, P.S.-CHAPAR, DIST-CHAPAR, DIST-DHUBRI, ASSAM, PIN783348
VERSUS
M S MANIVANNAN, IAS AND ANR THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM, REVENUE (RELIEF AND REHABILITATION) AND D.M DEPARTMENT, DISPUR, GHY-6
2:ANBAMUTHAN MUTHUSWAMY PALANISWAMY IAS THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER DHUBRI ASSAM P.O. AND P.S.-DHUBRI DIST- DHUBRI ASSAM PIN-78330
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. M HUSSAIN
Advocate for the Respondent : MR. D SAIKIA (r-1,2)
Page No.# 2/2
BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MANISH CHOUDHURY
ORDER
06.08.2022
Mr. A.K. Das, learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that since the order against which this application has been filed, has been complied with and therefore, the application may be closed.
Ms. N. Bordoloi, learned counsel for the respondent nos. 1 and 2 is present.
In view of the above submission made by Mr. Das, learned counsel for the petitioner, this contempt application is closed.
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant
Nur Jahan Begom Ahmed
M S Manivannan, IAS (and another)
Anbamuthan Muthuswamy Palaniswamy IAS
Manish Choudhury
As recorded by the court registry
Proceedings for wilful disobedience of a court order under the Contempt of Courts Act 1971.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
