Haren Deka v. Rakesh Kumar, IAS and 2 Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
In a contempt petition alleging wilful violation of a prior order directing submission of pension papers, the petitioner was absent. The Court observed that the Principal Accountant General had already issued the relevant P.P.O. and forwarded it. Consequently, the petition found no violation and was closed.
What did the court decide?
Contempt petition stands closed; communication regarding issued P.P.O. kept on record.