Petitioner submitted compliance of prior order making contempt case infructuous. Court closed the contempt proceeding without elaborate reasoning.
Contempt case closed
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010129272021
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : Cont.Cas(C)/294/2021
KASHEM ALI
S/O- LT. PASU, R/O- VILL- KALBARI GAON, P.O. BHALUKADOBA, P.S. SORBHOG, DIST.- BARPETA, ASSAM, PIN- 781217
VERSUS
M S MANIVANNAN AND ANR IAS, THE COMM. AND SECY. TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM, REVENUE (RELIEF AND REHABILITATION) AND DISASTER MANAGEMENT DEPTT., DISPUR, GHY-06
2:TEJ PRASAD BHUSAL ACS THE DY. COMMISSIONER BARPETA DIST.- BARPETA ASSAM PIN- 78130
Advocate for the Petitioner : MD. I H KHAN
Advocate for the Respondent : MR. D SAIKIA (r-1)
BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUMAN SHYAM
ORDER
Date : 08-08-2022
Page No.# 2/2
Mr. I.H. Khan, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the order of this
Court has already been complied with and therefore, this contempt case has become infructuous.
Taking note of the submission of Mr. Khan, this contempt case stands closed.
Mr. R. Borpujari, learned standing counsel, Finance Department is present on behalf of the respondent No. 1.
JUDGE
GS
Comparing Assistant
Kashem Ali
M S Manivannan and Anr
Tej Prasad Bhusal
Suman Shyam
As recorded by the court registry
Proceedings for wilful disobedience of a court order under the Contempt of Courts Act 1971.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
