Puneet Rastogi v. D. M. Lucknow and 2 Ors.
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Regular Appeal No. 216/2018 Date: 21.07.2022
Puneet Rastogi Vs. District Magistrate Lucknow and Ors.
Present: Shri Swayambhoo Chandranshul, counsel for the appellant, Shri Maneesh Mehrotra, counsel for the respondent no. 2- Bank,
The office report dated 20.07.2022 shows that the notice sent to the respondent no. 3 has returned back with endorsement “insufficient address”. Let the learned counsel for the appellant take steps within 15 days for service of notice upon the respondent no. 3 through publication in the newspapers having wide circulation in the area. Affidavit of service along with proof of publication be filed by the next date.
List this case on 12.10.2022 for service.
Justice R. D. Khare Chairperson
Anupam
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Puneet Rastogi
- respondent
District Magistrate Lucknow
- respondent
Bank
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
6 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court