Nandeswar Hazarika v. Niraj Verma and 2 Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
Judge closed the contempt petition for non-compliance with the order dated 10.04.2019 in WP(C)/3560/2018.
What did the court decide?
Contempt petition closed.
Judge closed the contempt petition for non-compliance with the order dated 10.04.2019 in WP(C)/3560/2018.
Contempt petition closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010081102020
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : Cont.Cas(C)/230/2020
NANDESWAR HAZARIKA
S/O. LT. AKONMAN HAZARIKA, R/O. 2 NO. BAMUNGAON, BORA PATH, P.O. CHENGELIGAON, KENDUGURI, P.S. JORHAT, PIN-785010, DIST. JORHAT, ASSAM.
VERSUS
NIRAJ VERMA AND 2 ORS.
THE COMMISSIONER AND SECY. TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM, URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPTT., DISPUR, GUWAHATI-781006, KAMRUP (M), ASSAM.
2:RAMENDRA NATH SARMAH THE COMMISSIONER ASSAM STATE HOUSING BOARD R.G. BARUAH ROAD GUWAHATI-781005 KAMRUP (M) ASSAM.
3:JADAV DEKA THE CHAIRMAN ASSAM STATE HOUSING BOARD R.G. BARUAH ROAD GUWAHATI-781005 KAMRUP (M) ASSAM
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. D M NATH
Advocate for the Respondent : MR. I CHOUDHURY
Page No.# 2/2
BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN DEV CHOUDHURY
ORDER
26.04.2022
Heard Mr. D. M. Nath, the learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. I. Choudhury, the learned counsel for the respondents.
It is submitted by the learned counsel for the parties that the order dated 10.04.2019 passed in WP(C)/3560/2018 has been complied with.
Accordingly, this contempt petition is closed.
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant
Nandeswar Hazarika
Niraj Verma
Arun Dev Choudhury
As recorded by the court registry
Proceedings for wilful disobedience of a court order under the Contempt of Courts Act 1971.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court