Sarbashri Basumatary v. Jagadish Prasad Brahma
Case brief
What is this about?
In an application filed under the Contempt of Courts Act, the Gauhati High Court observed that the contemnor's affidavit clarified the petitioner was terminated for having no valid post. The court noted nothing remained to be decided and closed the proceeding.
What the court decided
Page No.# 1/3
GAHC010154102020
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : Cont.Cas(C)/511/2020
SARBASHRI BASUMATARY
W/O SRI RATNESWAR BASUMATARY, R/O VILL. AND P.O. KHAMARDWISA, P.S. SIMLA, DIST. BAKSA, ASSAM, PIN-783375
VERSUS
JAGADISH PRASAD BRAHMA
DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION, BODOLAND TERRITORIAL COUNCIL KOKRAJHAR (BTAD), P.O. KOKRAJHAR, PIN-783370, DIST KOKRAJHAR, BTAD, ASSAM
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. J C GOGOI
Advocate for the Respondent : MR. B CHOUDHURY
BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DEVASHIS BARUAH
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the instant contempt proceedings require adjudication on the salary arrears claim given the verification regarding the petitioner's termination.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Sarbashri Basumatary
- respondent
Jagadish Prasad Brahma
- respondent
Director of Education, Bodoland Territorial Council Kokrajhar
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Gauhati HC
- Decided on
- · April
- Registered
- Case no.
- Cont.Cas(C)/511/2020
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court