Geeta Mihu v. Pankaj Kumar Jha (Ias) and 6 Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
The petitioner filed a contempt petition. The court noted that a subsequent writ appeal filed by the respondents had been allowed, thereby extinguishing the cause of action for contempt. Consequently, the contempt petition was closed.
What did the court decide?
The contempt petition is closed due to the extinction of the cause of action.
What the court decided
Page No.# 1/3
GAHC040009532021
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) (ITANAGAR BENCH)
Case No. : Cont.Cas(C) 21/2021
1:Geeta Mihu S/o Shri M. Mihu,
Permanent resident of Village Koyla Basti (Karu), P.O/P.S Anini, Dibang Valley District, Arunachal Pradesh
VERSUS
1:Pankaj Kumar Jha (IAS) and 6 Ors
Secretary Land Management, Govt. of Arunachal Pradesh, Itanagar
2:A.K.Singh
Director of Land Management Govt. of Arunachal Pradesh Itanagar
3:Pagli Sora Deputy Commissioner Dibang Valley District Anini.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Geeta Mihu
- respondent
Pankaj Kumar Jha
- respondent
Pagli Sora
- respondent
Ajay Kumar IAS
- respondent
S.N Gupta
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Gauhati HC
- Decided on
- · April
- Registered
- Case no.
- Cont.Cas(C)/21/2021
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court