The single-judge bench dismissed a writ petition for want of service on the respondent, noting the petitioner's counsel failed to execute service despite prior directions.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page No.# 1/3
GAHC010009512014
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : WP(C)/2435/2014
NIRAMOY RANJAN DEY and ANR
S/O- LT. MANORANJAN DEY, R/O VILL.- LAKHIPUR PART- I, P.O.KALAIN,P.S.- KATIGORAH, DIST.- CACHAR, ASSAM, PIN- 788815.
2: DEEPAK SEN @ DEEPAK RANJAN SEN S/O- LT. BHUPENDRA KUMAR SEN R/O VILL.- LAKHIPUR PART- I P.O.- KALAIN P.S.- KATIGORAH DIST.- CACHAR ASSAM PIN- 788815
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 6 ORS
REP. BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECY. TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM, DEPTT. OF ELEMENTARY EDUCATION, DISPUR, GHY- 6, ASSAM.
2:THE DIRECTOR OF ELEMENTARY EDUCATION ASSAM KAHILIPARA GHY- 19 KAMRUP M ASSAM.
3:THE MISSION DIRECTOR SARBA SIKSHA ABHIJAN KAHILIPARA GHY- 19 KAMRUP M ASSAM SILCHAR MUNICIPAL BOARD CACHAR
Page No.# 2/3
ASSAM.
4:THE DIST. MISSION COORDINATOR CUM DIST. ELE. EDUCATION OFFICER CACHAR ASSAM. 5:THE DY. COMMISSIONER CACHAR SILCHAR ASSAM. 6:THE ASSTT. SETTLEMENT OFFICER KATIGORAH DIST.- CACHAR ASSAM PIN- 788815. 7:THE KALAIN NADHBANGA VIDHYALAYA KALAIN P.S.- KATIGORAH DIST.- CACHAR REP. BY THE HEAD MASTER CUM SECY
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR.S R BORUAH
Advocate for the Respondent : MR.S SARMA
BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN DEV CHOUDHURY
ORDER
25.04.2022
Office Note dated 06.04.2022 reflects that the petitioners have not taken steps for service of notice upon the respondent No. 7 despite repeated directions of the Lawazima Court.
The learned counsel for the petitioners, Mr. D. Chakrabarty, submits that he is having no contact with his client however he could obtain the status of the
Page No.# 3/3
suit which is also relates to this present writ petition and submits that the said suit has been decreed on compromise. Accordingly, he submits, that the same may be the reason why the petitioners are not touch with him.
Be that as it may, as no step has been taken for service upon the respondent No. 7, this writ petition is dismissed for want of service.
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant
Niramoynan Ranjan Dey and Anr
The State of Assam and 6 Ors
Arun Dev Choudhury
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
