Ramesh Chand v. Manish Gupta & Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI +…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~8
versus MANISH GUPTA & ORS ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Siddharth Shankar Ray, Adv. for R2. Mr. Mukesh Gupta, Standing Counsel with Ms. Shashi Gupta, Adv. for NDMC. Mr. Sanjay Goswami, Adv. for R3 & R4. Inspector Satendra Mohan, SHO and SI Anuj Singh, PS-H.N. Din.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO
O R D E R
% 19.04.2018
Present contempt petition has been filed by the petitioner alleging violation of order dated May 31, 2017. It is the submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner that though the shop has not been demolished, but because of the demolition carried out above the shop, cracks have appeared on the walls of the shop occupied by the petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the shop requires repair work.
Mr. Sanjay Goswami, learned counsel appearing for the respondent nos. 3 and 4 states, respondents are ready and willing to carry out the
necessary repair work, i.e., plastering of the walls and the roof, for which the petitioner needs to vacate the shop.
Learned counsel for the petitioner on instructions, is agreeable to the said submission. He also states, appropriate date shall be intimated to the respondent nos. 3 and 4 to carry out the repair work.
In view of the above, learned counsel for the parties states, the contempt petition be closed. Ordered accordingly.
CM No. 22424/2017
In view of the order passed in the contempt petition, this application has become infructuous and dismissed as such.
V. KAMESWAR RAO, J
APRIL 19, 2018 /jg
RAMESH CHAND
MANISH GUPTA
Respondent No. 3
Respondent No. 4
V. KAMESWAR RAO
As recorded by the court registry
Proceedings for wilful disobedience of a court order under the Contempt of Courts Act 1971.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court