Petitioner sought to withdraw a writ petition due to execution of a conveyance deed; the court dismissed the petition as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~22
..... Petitioner
Through: Mr.Pradhuman Gautam, Adv.
versus
DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY AND ORS
..... Respondent
Through: Mr.Amit Saxena, Adv. for R3s
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO O R D E R % 18.04.2018
Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner states that as the
conveyance deed has been executed on March 23, 2018, he wishes to withdraw the writ petition.
The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
V. KAMESWAR RAO, J
APRIL 18, 2018 /akb
M/S RAGHAV INDUSTRIAL PRODUCTS
DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY AND ORS
V. KAMESWAR RAO
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
