Petitioner sought writ to stop demolition of a shop. Respondents shifted on record that they had no intention to demolish. Petitioner accepted this, finding grievance satisfied, leading to dismissal.
Petition disposed; connection applications dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~25 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
versus
STATE OF NCT AND ORS ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Santosh Kr. Tripathi, ASC with Mr. Shashank Tiwari and Mr. Parth Vasisth, Advs. for R1 and R6. Mr. Mukesh Gupta, Standing Counsel with Ms. Shashi Gupta, Adv. for NDMC.
Mr. Sanjay Goswami, Adv. for R3 to R5. Inspector Satendra Mohan, SHO and SI Anuj Singh, PS-H.N. Din.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO
O R D E R % 19.04.2018
CM. No. 2104/2018 (for exemption)
Exemption allowed subject to all just exceptions.
Application stands disposed of.
W.P.(C) 4173/2017
Present petition has been filed by the petitioner with the following prayers:
“In the above mentioned facts and circumstances, it is most respectfully prayed that this Hon’ble Court may graciously be pleased to pass appropriate orders: -
In substance, it is the submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner has filed this petition seeking a direction against respondent no.2 not to demolish Shop No.10, Property No. 4749, Khasra No. 865/352, Central Road, Bhogal, New Delhi. Mr. Sanjay Goswami, learned counsel appearing for the respondent nos. 3 to 5 states, the said respondents have no intention to demolish the Shop No.10 which at present is in the occupation of the petitioner herein. The said statement is taken on record.
In view of the statement made by Mr. Goswami, learned counsel for the petitioner states, this shall satisfy the grievance of the petitioner in this petition and requests the petition be disposed of. Ordered accordingly.
CM Nos. 22201/2017, 28308/2017, 28309/2017 & 2103/2018
In view of the order passed in the petition, these applications have
become infructuous and dismissed as such.
V. KAMESWAR RAO, J
APRIL 19, 2018 /jg
Petitioner
State of NCT and Ors.
V. KAMESWAR RAO
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
