Disposed

Rc Gupta v. Anil Chowdhary

Delhi HC20 Apr 2018CONT.CAS(C)/282/2011

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a contempt petition alleging non-compliance of an order regarding pension arrears, the Court directed the petitioner not to suffer due to inter-se disputes between the respondents. The Court ordered the primary respondent to release the computed arrears within four weeks without prejudice to pending litigation. The contempt petition was closed.

What did the court decide?

Direction to respondent No.1 to release arrears of retirement benefits including gratuity, leave encashment, commutation of pension, and arrears of pension computed till the date of payment within fou

Rc Gupta Vs Anil Chowdhary — Contempt of Court | Delhi HC (2018)

¶1

$~46

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- CONT.CAS(C) 282/2011 RC GUPTA ..... Petitioner

¶4

Through: Ms. Jasneet Kaur, Adv. with Mr. Gaurav Chauhan, Adv.

¶5

versus

¶6

ANIL CHOWDHARY

¶7

	..... Respondent
Through:	Mr. Sudhir Nandrajog, Sr. Adv. with
	Ms. Moulshree Shukla & Mr. Aditya
	Gutpa, Adv. for R-1
	Mr. Sumeet Pushkarna, SC with Mr.
	Devanshu Lahiry, Adv. for R-2

¶8

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO O R D E R % 20.04.2018

¶9

The present contempt petition has been filed alleging non compliance of order dated September 22, 2006 in W.P.(C) No. 408/2000.

¶10

Mr. Sudhir Nandrajog, learned Senior Counsel appearing for

¶11

respondent No.1/NDPL states, in order to put quietus to the litigation and without prejudice and without admitting the liability, the respondent No.1/NDPL is ready and willing to pay ` 2,50,968/- against the arrears of pension including gratuity, leave encashment, commutation of pension as determined by the learned Registrar General on February 16, 2016 and noted

¶12

by this Court on September 14, 2016. He further states, further liability beyond the said amount shall be of the DVB Pension Trust.

¶13

Mr. Pushkarna disputes the same, as according to him the complete amount as of date need to be paid by the respondent No.1-NDPL. He concedes monthly pension has to be paid by the DVB Pension Trust. This Court is of the view that because of the inter-se disputes between the respondent No.1-NDPL and the DVB Pension Trust, the petitioner should not be made to suffer. Accordingly, it is directed that the respondent No.1NDPL, without prejudice shall release the arrears of retiral benefits including gratuity, leave encashment, commutation of pension and arrears of pension computed till the date of the payment (which includes `2,50,968/-) to the petitioner within four weeks from today.

¶14

The aforesaid shall be subject to the litigation(s) pending between the NDPL and the DVB Pension Trust before any Court. The contempt petition is closed.

¶15

V. KAMESWAR RAO, J

¶16

APRIL 20, 2018 /ak

Rc Gupta v. Anil Chowdhary

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rc Gupta v. Anil Chowdhary

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Desh Raj Singh & Anr. Vs Bhupesh Choudhary & Anr.

Uma Walia Vs S. Surjeet Singh Bedi, Chairman & Anr.

Ramesh Chand Vs Manish Gupta & Ors.

Vinay Kumar Mahajan Vs Rajesh Rawat

Dr Aliya Rajput Vs Saumaya Gupta

Jagat Narain Subharti Charitable Trust & Anr. Vs Preeti Sudan

Jatin Kumar Saikia Vs N.C.Nipun, MCD & Ors.

Social Jurist a Civil Rights Group Thr Kusum Sharma Vs Amit Yadav & Ors.

Manjeet Singh Vs Bses (Rpl) & Ors.

Ramesh Chand Vs State of NCT and Ors.

Ramesh Chand Vs Manish Gupta & Ors.

Ashutosh Tyagi Vs Tata Power Delhi Distribution Limited

Mahender Singh and Ors. Vs Union of India and Ors.

Prajpita Brahma Kumari R Venkata Kanaka Ratnam and Ors. Vs North Delhi Municipal Corporation