The High Court of Delhi disposed of two connected matters: one allowing an exemption and the other dismissing a withdrawn writ petition with liberty to refile.
Exemption allowed on conditions; writ petition and connected application dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~40
MS. CHANDRAYI BASUTHAKUR ..... Petitioner Through: Counsel (appearance not given)
versus
STATE AND ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Siddharth Dutta, Adv. for R1 to R3.
Mr. Kapil Dutta, Adv. for SDMC.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO
O R D E R
% 18.04.2018
CM. No. 14384/2018 (for exemption)
Exemption allowed subject to all just exceptions.
Application stands disposed of.
CM. No. 15038/2018
This is an application filed by the applicant / petitioner for withdrawal of the writ petition with liberty to file appropriate petition before the appropriate court of law.
With liberty as prayed for, the petition and the connected application being CM. No. 14385/2018 (for directions) are dismissed as withdrawn.
The application stands disposed of.
Date already fixed, i.e., August 14, 2018 stands cancelled.
V. KAMESWAR RAO, J
APRIL 18, 2018/ jg
Ms. Chandrayi Basuthakur
State
V. Kameswar Rao
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
