Dismissed

Sarthak Khandelwal & Ors. v. Amrita Sharan (Executive Director Ir)

Delhi HC17 Apr 2018CONT.CAS(C)/275/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In this order, the court dismissed a contempt petition filed by petitioners for violation of an order dated February 5, 2018. The court allowed the withdrawal of the petition to challenge a respondent communication dated April 17, 2018 as an alternative remedy.

What did the court decide?

Contempt petition dismissed as withdrawn; exemption allowed on application subject to conditions.

Sarthak Khandelwal & Ors. Vs Amrita Sharan (Executive… — Contempt of Court | Delhi HC (2018)

¶1

$~46

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- CONT.CAS(C) 275/2018, CM No. 14947/2018

¶4

SARTHAK KHANDELWAL & ORS ..... Petitioners

¶5

Through: Mr.Aditya Mewara, Adv.

¶6

versus

¶7

AMRITA SHARAN (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR IR) ..... Respondent Through: Ms.Suruchi Suri, Adv.

¶8

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO O R D E R % 17.04.2018

¶9

CM No.14947/2018

¶10

Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

¶11

Application stands disposed of.

¶12

Cont. Cas. (C) 275/2018

¶13

This contempt petition has been filed for violation of order dated February 5, 2018.

¶14

Today, the learned counsel for the respondent, who appears on advance notice, has placed before the Court a communication dated April 17, 2018, addressed to the petitioners herein, intimating the decision on the appeal dated November 6, 2017. I may also state here, insofar as the

¶15

petitioner’s representation is concerned, the stand of the respondent is as under:

¶16

“Vide order dated 05.02.2018, the Hon‟ble Delhi High Court has directed the 2^nd Respondent to consider and decide the Petitioner‟s Representation and Appeal Annexure P-5 of W.P. No. 1008 of 2018).

¶17

Whilst the Appeal is a letter dated 06.11.2017 addressed to Director-Personnel and Industrial Relations against the new seniority list prepared to define Command Training Policy issued under Circular no. HOP/06-4381A/585 dated 19.06.2017, there is no representation on record despite the statement made in the court on your instructions that a Representation was filed in July 2017.

¶18

This office was unable to trace any such representation and has now obtained copy of a communication dated 14.07.2017 to Capt. Aditya Singh Dhillon, General Secretary of the India Ltd. Since this letter has not been addressed to Air India Limited, the same cannot be responded to specifically”.

¶19

In view of the above, the learned counsel for the petitioners, seeks to withdraw the contempt petition, so as to challenge the communication dated April 17, 2018 in accordance with the law. The contempt petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

¶20

V. KAMESWAR RAO, J

¶21

APRIL 17, 2018 /akb

Sarthak Khandelwal & Ors. v. Amrita Sharan (Executive Director Ir)

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sarthak Khandelwal & Ors. v. Amrita Sharan (Executive Director Ir)

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Siraj Ahmed & Ors. Vs Mehboob Alam & Ors.

Bses Yamuna Power Ltd. Vs G L Meena & Anr.

Dinesh Singh Rawat Vs Mamta Nanda & Ors.

Indosolar Vs J S Deepak & Ors.

Desh Raj Singh & Anr. Vs Bhupesh Choudhary & Anr.

Uma Walia Vs S. Surjeet Singh Bedi, Chairman & Anr.

Ramesh Chand Vs Manish Gupta & Ors.

Rc Gupta Vs Anil Chowdhary

Mrs. Vasumati Mahajan and Anr. Vs South Delhi Municipal Corporation and Ors.

Bses Yamuna Power Ltd. Vs G L Meena & Anr.

Sh. Avinash Chiranjeev Vs South Delhi Municipal Corporation

Vinay Kumar Mahajan Vs Rajesh Rawat

Dr Devender Pal Singh Tomar Vs Lt Gen Bipin Puri & Anr.

Birender Sangwan Vs Madhup Vyas Worthy Commissioner North Mcd,Delhi & Ors.