Petitioner withdrew a contempt petition regarding non-compliance of earlier salary payment directions to Safai Karamcharis. The High Court dismissed the petition as withdrawn, allowing an exemption subject to exceptions.
Contempt petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~47
Through: Mr.Joginder Sukhija, Adv.
versus
MADHUP VYAS WORTHY COMMISSIONER NORTH MCD,DELHI & ORS ..... Respondents Through: Mr.Ajjay Aroraa, Adv. with Mr.Kapil Dutta, Adv. for NDMC Ms.Mini Pushkarna, Adv., Ms.S.Bhuyan, Ms.Rekha Goswami, Advs. for EDMC (R3 and R4)
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO O R D E R % 17.04.2018 CM No.14976/2018
Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions.
Application stands disposed of.
Cont. Cas. (C) 276/2018
The present petition has been filed by the petitioner, alleging non compliance of the order dated July 11, 2016, whereby this court had directed the respondents to pay the salary with the following directions:
“4. Resultantly, the present writ petitions are disposed of with the following directions:-
Mr. Sukhija, learned counsel for the petitioner states that he wishes to withdraw the contempt petition and shall approach the Division Bench by
way of an application in the pending writ petition(s) as according to him, directions have been given by the Division Bench for payment of salary to the Safai Karamcharis in the Municipal Corporation.
The contempt petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
V. KAMESWAR RAO, J
APRIL 17, 2018 /akb
BIRENDER SANGWAN
MADHUP VYAS
V. KAMESWAR RAO
As recorded by the court registry
Proceedings for wilful disobedience of a court order under the Contempt of Courts Act 1971.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
