Petitioner sought leave to withdraw Public Interest Litigation No. 27 of 2014. The Court disposed of the petition as withdrawn without hearing arguments.
Petition disposed of as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
{1}
pil 27.14 .odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
PUBLIC INTERST LITIGATION NO.27 OF 2014
Maharashtra Rajya B.Ed. Kruti Samiti
Aurangabad.
Petitioner/s
Versus
State of Maharashtra and others.
Respondent/s
Mr.U.B. Bondar, advocate for the petitioner.
Mr.S.G. Karlekar, AGP for the Respondent
CORAM : R.M. BORDE &
A.M. BADAR, JJ.
DATE : 21ST MARCH, 2014.
PER COURT:
1]Counsel for petitioner, on instructions,
seeks leave to withdraw the petition. Petition is
disposed of as withdrawn.
[A.M. BADAR][R.M. BORDE]
JUDGEJUDGE.
grt/-
Maharashtra Rajya B.Ed. Kruti Samiti
State of Maharashtra and others
R.M. Borde
A.M. Badar
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court