The court dismissed a writ petition seeking directions for acceptance of a report regarding creation of an Irrigation Assistant cadre. The petitioner was denied locus standi as an advocate with no public interest involved in the matter.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
wp812213.odt
{1}
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO.8122 OF 2013
Harshal Bhagchand Shinde
Petitioner
Versus
The State of Maharashtra
and another
Respondents
Mr.C.V.Joshi, advocate for the petitioner Mr.K.G.Patil, A.G.P. for Respondents.
CORAM : R.M.BORDE &
A.M.BADAR, JJ. DATE :20th March, 2014
PER COURT:
1 The petitioner is seeking a direction for acceptance of report tendered by the Study Group recommending creation of cadre of Irrigation Assistant. The petitioner is an advocate and as such, has no locus to claim directions. Since the subject matter, giving rise to presentation of instant petition, concerns creation of a cadre in the Irrigation Department, there is no public interest involved which may give rise to presentation of the instant petition for consideration thereof. Writ Petition is devoid of substance.
Writ Petition stands dismissed.
A.M. BADAR
JUDGE
R.M.BORDE
JUDGE
adb/wp812213
Harshal Bhagchand Shinde
The State of Maharashtra
R.M. Borde
A.M. Badar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
