The petition was disposed of after the respondent's counsel stated that the petitioner's pending application would be considered by the Haj Committee CEO as per existing policy and a Supreme Court decision.
None. The pending application of the petitioner was to be considered by the Chief Executive Officer, Haj Committee.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2777.13 wp.odt
{1}
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO.2777 OF 2013
Mukhtar Ahmed Momin Karumuddin
Petitioner/s
Versus
Govt. of India and another.
Respondent/s
Mr. Momin Mustafa,advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. P.V. Mandlik, Senior Counsel, instructed by Mr.
Amol Gandhi, Advocate for the Respondent No.2
Mr. Nitin Chaudhary, Advocate for respondent No.1.
CORAM : R.M. BORDE &
A.M. BADAR, JJ.
DATE : 21ST MARCH, 2014.
PER COURT:
1]Learned Senior Counsel appearing for the
respondent No.2 - Haj Committee informs that if the
petitioner tenders an application to the Chief
Executive Officer for the ensuing year, same would be
considered in accordance with the policy prescribed by
the Haj Committee and in consonance with the decision
rendered by the Supreme Court. He further states that
he would inform the Chief Executive Officer to accept
the application.
2]In view of the statement made by learned
Senior Counsel, Writ petition stands disposed of.
[A.M. BADAR][R.M. BORDE]
JUDGE JUDGE.
grt/-
Mukhtar Ahmed Momin Karumuddin
Govt. of India
R.M. Borde
A.M. Badar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court