A writ petition filed against the Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum was disposed of solely on preliminary grounds that it had become infructuous due to subsequent developments; the petition was ruled discharged without a substantive adjudication.
The petition is disposed of as infructuous; Rule is discharged.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1016.10 wp.odt
{1}
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO.1016 OF 2010
Pravin Baburao Hire and others.
Petitioner/s
Versus
Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum
Aurangabad and others.
Respondent/s
Mr. P.R. Katneshwar, advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. M.M. Neralikar, AGP for the Respondent No.1
Mr. N.R. Bhawar, Advocate for R-3
CORAM : R.M. BORDE &
A.M. BADAR, JJ.
DATE : 21ST MARCH, 2014.
PER COURT:
1]In view of subsequent developments, the
petition has become infructuous. Same is accordingly
disposed of as such. Rule is discharged. No costs.
[A.M. BADAR][R.M. BORDE]
JUDGEJUDGE.
grt/-
Pravin Baburao Hire and others
Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum Aurangabad and others
R.M. BORDE
A.M. BADAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court