The High Court of Bombay disposed of Public Interest Litigation No. 167 of 2010, holding that the petition would not survive due to the passage of time.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
pil167.10
cpm
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO . IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO. 167 OF 2010
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions Court’s or Judge’s orders and Registrar's orders.
Mr. S.S. Deshmukh for the Petitioner. Mr. N.P. Deshpande, AGP for Respondent Nos. 1 and 2.
CORAM : A.S.OKA AND A.A. SAYED, JJ.
DATE : MARCH 19 2014.
P.C.:
Considering the prayers in Petition, with
the passage of time, the Petition will not survive now. We accordingly dispose of the Petition.
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the PIL petition will survive in light of the passage of time.
Petitioner
Respondent Nos. 1 and 2
A.S. OKA
A.A. SAYED
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
