The petitioners sought leave to withdraw a Public Interest Litigation. The High Court granted leave and dismissed the PIL as withdrawn. The order is disposed of without any adjudication on merits.
Leave to withdraw the Public Interest Litigation granted; PIL dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
pil11613.odt
{1}
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
PUBLIC INTERST LITIGATION NO.116 OF 2013
Sayyed Abdul Rauf s/o Sayyed Zamir & others
Petitioners
Versus
The State of Maharashtra & others
Respondents
Mr.Javed H. Deshmukh, advocate for the petitioners Mr.K.G.Patil, A.G.P. for Respondents No.1 to 3. Mr.S.S.Tope, advocate for Respondents No.4 & 5. Mr.P.R.Patil, advocate for Respondent No.6.
CORAM : R.M.BORDE &
A.M.BADAR, JJ. DATE :20th March, 2014
PER COURT:
Learned Counsel for the petitioners, on instructions,
seeks leave to withdraw the Public Interest Litigation (PIL).
Leave granted.
PIL is dismissed as withdrawn.
A.M. BADAR R.M.BORDE
JUDGE JUDGE
adb/pil11613
Sayyed Abdul Rauf and others
The State of Maharashtra
R.M. Borde
A.M. Badar
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
