Dismissed
Vasantrao Sitaram Kondalkar v. the Union of India and Ors.
Bombay HCPIL/107/2010
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
krs
PIL107.10
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO . IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO.107 OF 2010
_________________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions Court’s or Judge’s orders and Registrar’s orders.
None present for the Petitioner. None present for the Respondents.
CORAM : A.S. OKA & A.A. SAYED,JJ. DATE : MARCH 21, 2014. P.C.:
None appears for the Petitioner. On 18.01.2014, none appeared for the Petitioner. Even on 14.02.2014, none appeared for the Petitioner. Hence, we dismiss the PIL for non-prosecution.
(A.S. OKA, J.) (A.A. SAYED, J.)
Petitioner
Respondents
A.S. OKA
A.A. SAYED
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court