This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
pil192
1
ssp
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO.192 OF 2013
Office Notes, Office
Memorandam of Coram,
appearances, Court’s orders Court’s or Judge’s orders
or directions and
Registrar’s orders
Mr.Aniruddha Arun Garge for the Petitioner
Mr.Vilas Bhosale petitioner in person present
Ms Shenaz Bharucha for the Respondent-UOI.
CORAM : A.S.OKA, &
A.A.SAYED,JJ.
DATE : MARCH 14, 2014.
P.C.
1The learned counsel for the
petitioner on instructions of the
petitioner who is stated to be present
in the Court states that the petitioner
has not drafted the petition properly.
He, therefore, on instructions seeks
permission to withdraw this petition
with liberty to file a fresh petition
containing proper averments. We
accordingly dispose of the petition as
withdrawn with liberty as prayed.
Office Notes, Office Memorandum
Respondent-UOI
A.S. Oka
A.A. Sayed
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court