Shubhakamana Co-Op. Hsg. Society v. Thane Municipal Corporation and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court of Judicature at Bombay declined to entertain a Public Interest Litigation seeking relief against illegal construction, as identical relief was sought in a previously withdrawn Writ Petition.
What did the court decide?
Public Interest Litigation rejected; prior liberty granted in Writ Petition No. 1164 of 2010 remains unaffected.
What the court decided
pil-124.10
1
ash
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO.124 OF 2010
Office Notes, Office memorandum of Coram, appearances, Court’s Court’s or orders or directions & Judge’s orders. Registrar’s orders.
Shri Sagar Joshi for the Petitioner.
CORAM : A.S. OKA & A.A. SAYED, JJ DATED : 18TH MARCH 2014
P.C.:
. Heard learned counsel appearing for the Petitioner. Apart from the fact that the members of the Petitioner are affected by the alleged illegal construction carried out by the third Respondent, the averments made in the Petition disclose that the same relief which is sought in this Public Interest Litigation was sought in Writ Petition No.1164 of 2010 in this Court. The synopsis discloses that this
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the court can entertain a Public Interest Litigation where the same relief was sought in an earlier withdrawn Writ Petition.
Whether the impugned construction by Third Respondent affects eligibility for PIL under the circumstances.
Coram
A.S. OKA
A.A. SAYED
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court