Public Interest Litigation was dismissed for want of prosecution due to non-appearance of the petitioners. No substantive grounds were adjudicated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
RMA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
P.I.L. NO. 145 OF 2009
Aba Saheb Vithoba More & Ors.
.. Petitioners
Vs
Subhash Mahadeo Sondkar & Ors.
.. Respondents
Mr. A.I. Patel, AGP for the State
CORAM : D. D. SINHA &
SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, JJ
DATE : 9th OCTOBER, 2012.
P.C.:
1. None present for the Petitioners.
2. Dismissed for want of prosecution.
[ SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, J ]
[ D. D. SINHA, J ]z
jfoanz vkacsjdj
Pg 1 of 1
Aba Saheb Vithoba More & Ors.
Subhash Mahadeo Sondkar & Ors.
D. D. SINHA
V.K. TAHILRAMANI
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
