This suomoto PIL regarding admission denial to a retired teacher older vouched dismissed due to efflux of time and lack of cause of action survival by 2012.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
PIL-209-09
skc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
SUOMOTO P.I.L. NO. 209 OF 2009
Unknown Retired Teacher ..Petitioner
versus
State of Maharashtra & Ors.
..Respondents
Ms. J. S. Pawar - Additional Government Pleader for State.
CORAM : D. D. SINHA AND SMT. V. K. TAHILRAMANI, JJ.
10 October 2012
P.C. :
Heard the learned Additional Government Pleader for the State.
written by retired teacher that inspite of securing marks - 148-49.33, 14949.66 and OBC - 133-44.33, 134- 44.66 in P.C.M. Group of 12th Standard Examination in the relevant year and though secured 80% marks in C.E.T. Examination, the College had refused admission.
1/2
PIL-209-09
skc
Due to efflux of time, we are of the view that the cause of action no more survives. PIL is disposed of accordingly.
(SMT. V. K. TAHILRAMANI, J.)
Chandka
2/2
Unknown Retired Teacher
State of Maharashtra
D. D. Sinha
V. K. Tahilramani
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
