Disposed
Anil N.Bugde v. State of Maharashtra and Ors.
Bombay HCPIL/118/2006
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
krs
PIL118.06
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO . IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO.118 OF 2006
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders.
Court’s or Judge’s orders
Party in person is absent. None present for the respondents.
CORAM : D.D. SINHA & SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ.
DATE : OCTOBER 08, 2012.
P.C.:
Party in person is absent. If the office
objection regarding payment of bhatta charges is not removed within two weeks, the PIL shall stand dismissed for want of prosecution without further reference to Court.
(D.D. SINHA, J.)
(SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.)
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the PIL shall be dismissed for want of prosecution if objection regarding payment of bhatta charges is not removed.
Petitioner
D.D. SINHA
SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court