The Bombay High Court dismissed Public Interest Litigation No. 203 of 2009 for want of prosecution due to the absence of counsel for the petitioner on the hearing date.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
PIL-203-09
skc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO. 203 OF 2009
Rajesh Sudhakar Nene ..Petitioner versus State of Maharashtra & Ors. ..Respondents
None for Petitioner. None for Respondents.
CORAM : D. D. SINHA AND SMT. V. K. TAHILRAMANI, JJ. 10 October 2012
P.C. :
Counsel for the petitioner absent. Dismissed for want of prosecution.
(D. D. SINHA, J.)
(SMT. V. K. TAHILRAMANI, J.)
Chandka
1/1
Rajesh Sudhakar Nene
State of Maharashtra
Ors.
D. D. Sinha
Smt. V. K. Tahilramani
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
