In this Public Interest Litigation, the High Court at Bombay disposed of the petition as withdrawn. However, the court reserved the substantive issues for future consideration, declining to grant indulgence in the matter.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
PIL-7-10
skc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO. 7 OF 2010
Shailendra Ranjan & Anr. ..Petitioners versus Ministry of Labour and Employment Union of India & Ors. ..Respondents
Mr. Onkar Gupte i/b. P. Wagale – Dalvi for Petitioners. Mr. A. I. Patel - Assistant Government Pleader for State – Respondent No. 2 Mr. V. V. Khemka for Respondent Nos. 3 and 4.
CORAM : D. D. SINHA AND SMT. V. K. TAHILRAMANI, JJ.
10 October 2012
P.C. :
Heard the learned counsel for the respective parties.
Considering the direction sought by the petitioners, it is difficult for
us to show any indulgence in the present PIL and therefore same is disposed of accordingly as withdrawn keeping the issues open.
(D. D. SINHA, J.)
(SMT. V. K. TAHILRAMANI, J.)
Chandka
1/1
Shailendra Ranjan & Anr.
Ministry of Labour and Employment
Union of India
D. D. Sinha
V. K. Tahilramani
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
