This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
krs
PIL91.01
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO . IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO.91 OF 2001
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders.
Court’s or Judge’s orders
None present for the petitioner. Mr.A.M.Vernekar for the respondent.
CORAM : D.D. SINHA &
SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ.
DATE : OCTOBER 08, 2012. P.C.:
None present for the petitioner. Mr.Vernekar appears for the respondent.
1 of 1
PETITIONER
RESPONDENT
D.D. SINHA
V.K.TAHILRAMANI
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
