Published order dismissing PIL.134 of 2008 for non-prosecution as no advocate appeared for the petitioner when called upon.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
PIL.134.2008.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO. 134 OF 2008
Kolhapur (Ujlaiwadi) Vimantal Prakalp Grast Shetkari Mandal : Petitioner versus The Collector, Kolhapur & Ors. : Respondents
None for the Petitioner.
Mr. Nitin Deshpande, AGP, for Respondent State.
CORAM:A.M.KHANWILKAR &
SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ.
DATED:OCTOBER 5, 2012
P.C. :
None appears for the Petitioner, when the matter is
called out. Dismissed for non prosecution.
(SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.) (A.M.KHANWILKAR,J.)
Page 1 of 1
J.V.Salunke,PA
Kolhapur (Ujlaiwadi) Vimantal Prakalp Grast Shetkari Mandal
The Collector, Kolhapur & Ors.
A.M. KHANWILKAR
V.K. TAHILRAMANI
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court