C.A. No.143 of 2004 filed in P.I.L. No.94 of 2003 was dismissed for want of prosecution as the applicant was absent from hearing. No relief granted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
krs
caw143.04
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO . IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE
CIVIL APPLICATION NO.143 OF 2004
In
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO.94 OF 2003
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders.
Court’s or Judge’s orders
None present for the applicant. Ms M.P.Thakur, A.G.P. for resp.no.1. CORAM : D.D. SINHA & SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ. DATE : OCTOBER 08, 2012. P.C.:
Counsel for the applicant absent. C.A. No.143 of 2004 is dismissed for want of prosecution.
(D.D. SINHA, J.)
(SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.)
1 of 1
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO.94 OF 2003
RESPONDENT 1
D.D. SINHA
V.K.TAHILRAMANI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
