Imran Farooqui v. Union of India and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
A PIL by Imran Farooqui was dismissed for want of prosecution as the petitioner was not present when called upon.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
RMA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
P.I.L. NO. 141 OF 2009
Imran Farooqui
.. Petitioner
Vs
Union of India & Ors.
.. Respondents
None Present.
CORAM : D. D. SINHA &
SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, JJ
DATE : 9th OCTOBER, 2012.
P.C.:
[ SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, J ]
[ D. D. SINHA, J ]z
jfoanz vkacsjdj
Pg 1 of 1
Imran Farooqui
Union of India
D. D. Sinha
V.K. Tahilramani
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court