COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY O. O. C. J. P.…
The petition is disposed of without issuing notice; the petitioner directed to submit a copy of representation to the Competent Authority in SRA for appropriate order within two months.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY O. O. C. J.
P. I. L. NO.68 OF 2007
Narayan Prasad Devnath Mali. Vs. State of Maharashtra & Ors.
...Petitioner.
...Respondents.
Mr. P. N. Shukla for the Petitioner. Mr. Kamal Katha i/b. Mehta & Co. for Respondent No.6. Mr.G. W. Mattos, AGP for the State.
CORAM : SWATANTER KUMAR, C.J. & DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD, J. October 18, 2007.
P.C. :
We do not consider it necessary to issue notice in this
petition at this stage. There is no proper intimation to the S.R.A. We direct the Petitioner to submit a copy of the representation to the Competent Authority in SRA who shall consider his representation and pass appropriate order within two months from the receipt of the
copy of the representation. The petition is disposed of.
CHIEF JUSTICE
Dr.D.Y. CHANDRACHUD, J.
Narayan Prasad Devnath Mali
State of Maharashtra
Swatanter Kumar
Dr. D. Y. Chandrachud
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
