In PIL Writ Petition No. 102 of 2003, the petitioner sought to withdraw the petition at the instance of his counsel. The Court, upon hearing the application, dismissed the writ petition as withdrawn on 25th October 2007.
null
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
PIL WRIT PETITION NO.102 OF 2003
Mr. Manikrao Shivajirao Kokate .. Petitioner v/s.
The State of Maharashtra and others
.. Respondents
Mr. Pankaj Deokar i/by Mr. S.M. Sabrad for the Petitioner. Mr. S.A. Ghaisas for the respondent Nos.4,6 and 7 to 10. Mr. V.P. Malvankar, Assistant Government Pleader for the respondent Nos.1 and 2.
CORAM : SWATANTER KUMAR, C.J. & DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD, J.
DATED : 25TH OCTOBER, 2007
P.C.
The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner wishes to withdraw this petition as per the instructions from his client. Dismissed as withdrawn.
CHIEF JUSTICE
DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD, J.
Mr. Manikrao Shivajirao Kokate
The State of Maharashtra and others
Swatanter Kumar
Dr. D.Y. Chandrachud
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
