Sumer Corporation v. State of Maharashtra through the Chief Secretary and 4 Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
A writ petition was withdrawn by the counsel appearing for the petitioner during hearing and was accordingly dismissed.
A writ petition was withdrawn by the counsel appearing for the petitioner during hearing and was accordingly dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY O.O.C.J.
WRIT PETITION NO. 1623 OF 2007
Sumer Corporation .. Petitioner v/s. State of Maharashtra and others .. Respondents
Mr. Vaibhav Sugdhare i/by M/s. Yasmin Bhansali & Co. for the Petitioner.
CORAM : SWATANTER KUMAR, C.J. & DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD, J.
DATED : 17TH OCTOBER, 2007
P.C.
The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner wishes to withdraw the petition. Petition is, accordingly, dismissed as withdrawn.
CHIEF JUSTICE
DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD, J.
Sumer Corporation
State of Maharashtra
Swatanter Kumar
Dr. D.Y. Chandrachud
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court