Disposed
Shubhangi Nishikant Gurav v. the Directorate of Technical Education and Anr.
Bombay HCPIL/98/2007
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
APPELLATE SIDE
P. I. L. NO.98 OF 2007
Shubhangi Nishikant Gurav through Guardian Nishikant Gurav (father).
Vs. The Directorate of Technical Education, Maharashtra State, Bombay & Anr.
...Petitioner.
...Respondents.
Mr.V. V. Yadav for the Petitioner.
Mr. A.A. Kumbhakoni, Asso. Advocate General for Respondent No.1 and 2.
CORAM : SWATANTER KUMAR, C.J. & DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD, J.
October 11, 2007 .
P.C. :
Counsel appearing for the Petitioner wishes to withdraw the
petition with liberty to make a representation to the Directorate of
Technical Education. If such a representation is moved within two
weeks, the Directorate of Technical Education shall decide the same
within six weeks thereafter. With this direction, the Petition is
2
disposed of as withdrawn.
CHIEF JUSTICE
Dr.D.Y. CHANDRACHUD, J.
Shubhangi Nishikant Gurav
Directorate of Technical Education, Maharashtra State
Swatanter Kumar
D.Y. Chandrachud
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court