The petitioner withdrew the petition regarding student examination centres without changing the allotted location. The High Court expected counsel to abide by the agreement and disposed of the writ petition.
The writ petition was disposed of as the petitioner withdrew the matter based on the respondent's undertaking.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN ITS CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
PUBLIC INTEREST PETITIION NO.152 OF 2007
Shri Prabhakar Anant Repal .. Petitioner v/s. Government of Maharashtra and others .. Respondents
Mr. S.S. Pakale for the Petitioner.
Mr. P.M. Patil, Assistant Government Pleader for the respondent No.1. Ms. Deepa Chavan for the respondent No.2.
CORAM : SWATANTER KUMAR, C.J. & DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD, J. DATED : 18TH OCTOBER, 2007
P.C.
The learned counsel appearing for the respondent No.2 as well as the learned AGP for the State submit that they would look into the matter and provide any alternate arrangement for holding the examinations of the students from Village Savarde. However, this is without changing the centre which has already been allotted.
containing various instructions, forms, time table etc. has been issued by the respondent No.2.
Writ petition is, accordingly, disposed of.
CHIEF JUSTICE
DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD, J.
Shri Prabhakar Anant Repal
Government of Maharashtra
Respondent No.2
Swatanter Kumar
Dr. D.Y. Chandrachud
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
