Petitioner sought to withdraw PIL No.66 of 2007 with liberty to file a fresh petition after collecting sufficient material and evidence. The Bombay High Court dismissed the petition as withdrawn, granting the requested liberty.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file fresh petition upon collecting material and evidence.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO.66 OF 2007
Just Society .. Petitioner v/s.
Union of India and others .. Respondents
Mr. Yogesh Paranjape i/by M/s. Paras Kuhad & Associates for the Petitioner.
Mr. G. Hariharan with Mr. N.D. Sharma i/by Mr. H.D. Rathod for the respondent No.1.
Mr. M.L. Patil for the respondent No.9.
CORAM : SWATANTER KUMAR, C.J. & DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD, J.
DATED : 25TH OCTOBER, 2007
P.C.
The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks to withdraw this PIL with liberty to file fresh petition if he has sufficient material and after collecting evidence, if any. Petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed.
CHIEF JUSTICE
DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD, J.
Just Society
Union of India
Swatanter Kumar
Dr. D.Y. Chandrachud
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
