Disposed
Sandeep Sharadchandra Thakur v. State of Maharashtra and Ors.
Bombay HCPIL/19/2007
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
APPELLATE SIDE
P. I. L. NO.19 OF 2007
Shri Sandeep S. Thakur. Vs. State of Maharashtra & Ors.
...Petitioner.
...Respondents.
Mr.Atul Rajadhyaksha i/b. Mr.Avinash Fatangare for the Petitioner. Mrs. J. S. Pawar, Addl. G.P. for Respondent No.1. Mr. A.A. Garge for Respondent No.3.
Mr. V.B. Naik i/b. M/s. M. Tripathi & Co. for Respondent Nos.7 and 8. Mr.Aspi Chinoy i/b. M/s. P.K. Shroff & Co. for Respondent No.6. Mr. R. D. Soni i/b. M/s. Ram & Co. for Respondent No.4. Mr. R.S. Datar for Respondent No.5.
CORAM : SWATANTER KUMAR, C.J. & DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD, J.
October 11, 2007 .
P.C. :
Counsel appearing for the Petitioner wishes to withdraw the
petition with liberty to file a fresh petition on the same cause of action, incorporating the subsequent events, correcting the errors appearing in the petition and questioning the directives of the Government dated 13th January 2006. The Petition is dismissed as withdrawn with
2
liberty as prayed.
CHIEF JUSTICE
Dr.D.Y. CHANDRACHUD, J.
Sandeep S. Thakur
State of Maharashtra
Respondent No.3
Respondent No.6
Respondent No.7
Respondent No.8
Swatanter Kumar
D.Y. Chandrachud
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court