Petitioner sought withdrawal of a writ petition regarding the Drugs and Magic Remedies Act. Court dismissed the petition as withdrawn with liberty to make a representation to the competent authority.
Writ petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to make a representation to the competent authority.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY O. O. C. J.
P. I. L. NO.52 OF 2007
Dr. Anil Kumar R. Shukla. Vs. State of Maharashtra & Ors.
...Petitioner.
...Respondents.
.... Mr. J. P. Sen i/b. M/s. Mohanty & Asso. for the Petitioner.
CORAM : SWATANTER KUMAR, C.J. & DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD, J. October 18, 2007.
P.C. :
Counsel appearing for the Petitioner wishes to withdraw the
Petition with liberty to make a representation to the Competent Authority under the provisions of the Drugs and Magic Remedies (Objectionable Advertisement) Act, 1954. If such a representation is not dealt with or is dealt with in a manner adverse to the interest of the Petitioner or public at large, he will be at liberty to take appropriate steps in accordance with law. The Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed.
CHIEF JUSTICE
Dr.D.Y. CHANDRACHUD, J.
Dr. Anil Kumar R. Shukla
State of Maharashtra
Swatanter Kumar
Dr. D.Y. Chandrachud
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
