Writ petition challenging suspension of an electricity department employee was permitted to be withdrawn at the petitioner's request and dismissed as withdrawn, with no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[33041
HrcH couRT FoR THE srATE oF fremueerue AT HyDERABAD (Special Original Uurisdiction)
TUESDAY, THE SECOND DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND ANP TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N/dIMAVARAPU RAJESHWAR RAO
wRtT PET|T|ON NO! 33901 0F 2012
Between:
D.V. Ganga Ram, Gangadhar, S/o. Sakkarfam, Hindu, Aged about 35years, Occ Junior Line Man (Under Suspension), O/o. Northern Power Distribution Company of A.P. Limited (NPDCL), Tandur Village, Nagireddypet lVlandel, Nizamabad District.
...PETITIONER
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Cgnstitution of lndiapraying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fileq therewith, the High Court maybe pleased tolssue a Writ order or direction, trnore particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declare the action of thp'lst respondentplacing thepetitioner under suspension through Office t{emo. No. DEE/OandC/KMRyADM/ E2lD.No.1285i12 Ot. 07.09.2012 is illegal, arbitrary as the suspension is based on confession which is against Article 20(3) of the Constitution of lndia,provisions of Sections 164 and 281 of Cr.P.C. and Sections 25,26,27 and 30 of lndian Evidence Act and consequently direct tfe respondents by holding that the petitioner is entitled to reinstatement with full salary for the suspensionperiod with all attendant benefits attached to his service.
l.A. NO: 1OF 2012 PMP. NO: 43'137 OF 12
Petition under Section 15'1 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased suspension the operation of suspension order of 1st respondent issued through Memo. No. DEE/O&C/KMR/ADM/E2ID.No .12851 1 2 Dl. 07 .09.201 2 by reinstating the petitioner into service, pending disposal of the Writ Petition
Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI C.YADAGIRI
Counsel forthe Respondents: SRI P.LAXMA REDDY
The Court made the following: ORDER
:_-.:*sIiW
THE HON'BLE SRI ]USTICE NAi4AVARAPU RAJESHWAR RAO
WRIT PET ONN 1
ORDER:
Mr.C.Yadagiri, learned counsel for the petitioner, has addressed a letter ro the Regist4ar (Judlcial) on 01.09.2025, seeking permission of this Court to withdraw the present writ petition.
Miscellaneous applications, if any pending, shall stancl
closeci. No order as to costs
SD/-K.AMMAJI DEPUTY REGISTRAR
//TRUE COFY//
SECTION OFFICER
To,
BSK
HIGH COURT
DATED:0210912025
CC TODAY
ORDER
1 $ tl ,:
Y
L) I
ti ,iiP 2015 o I II
.^
r \1 r*{r[]
.----:/
-'l
WP.No.33901 of 2012
DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS WITHDRAWN WITHOUT COSTS
4
D.V. Ganga Ram
The Divisional Engineer (Electrical), OANDC Division, NPDCL, Kamareddy
The Additional Assistant Engineer, NPDCL, Nagireddypet Mandal
Navavarapu Rajeshwar Rao
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
