Writ petition by unemployed candidates seeking permission to appear for test and interview for Contract JLM posts with the power distribution company; counsel stated the cause no longer survived and the petition was dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[33041
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY,THE SECOND DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENW FIVE
2T{{{TII
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NAMAVARAPU RAJESHWAR RAO
WRIT PETITION NO: 10974 OF 2007
Between:
...PETITIONERS
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ or order or direction, especially one in the nature of writ of Mandamus- i. declaring the action of the respondents in notpermitting the petitioner for the test and interview for appointment to the post of Contract JLM in terms of Notifications dt.6-6-2006 and d1.21-10-2006, as illegal and arbitrary ii. consequently for appointment to the post of Contract JLM in terms of notifications dt.6-6-2006 and dt.21-10-2006 and appoint them basing on their performance
Petitic,n under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to consider the petitioners case for the post of Contract JLM by pernritting us to appear for the post test and interview to be held either on 30-5-200,' or on any other subsequent date. and consider along with others, pending disp,:sal of the above w.p.
Counsel for lhe Petitioner: SRI K. VASUDEVA REDDY
Counsel for the Respondents: SRI A. CHANDRA SHAKER, SC FOR NPDCL The Court marde the following: ORDER
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE NAMAVARAPU RA'ESHWAR RAO
ORDER:
Sri K. Vasudeva Reddy, learned counsel for thepetitioners, informed this Court that the cause in the Writ Petition does not survive for adjudication and the Writ Petition has become infructuous.
Miscellaneous petitionspending, if any, shall stand closed.
BHAVANI SWAMY
//TRUE COPY//
OFFICER
BM GJP MMT
)
HIGH COURT
DATED:t02/,0U2025
o =i
I
1l{'i SIA
v
3 zzJAN2o26
.c)
-}<br>* .,k
WP.No.10974 ot 2007
DISMISSIING THE WRIT PETITION AS INFRUCTOUS THOUT COSTS
MI.{T &3 r&
S. Thirupathi
M. Yakub
M. Yohan
M. Vraprasad
Northern Power Distribution Company of AP Ltd., rep. by its Chief Engineer/Operation, Adilabad
The Superintending Engineer (Operation), NPDCL, Adilabad
Namavarapu Rajeshwar Rao
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
